metaphortunate son (
metaphortunate) wrote2013-10-17 05:30 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
incidentally
Posted without comment:
By the time Diana Vreeland joined Harper's Bazaar in 1937 as a junior editor, handbags had become an integral and important part of the fashion business, as she would quickly learn. Shortly after she arrived at the august glossy, Vreeland had what she described in her memoir, D.V., as a "brainwave!"- Deluxe: How Luxury Lost its Luster, by Dana Thomas
"We're going to eliminate all handbags," she told a colleague.
"You're going to what?" he responded.
"Eliminate all handbags," she repeated. "Now look. What have I got here? I've got cigarettes, I've got my lipstick, I've got my comb, I've got my powder, I've got my rouge, I've got my money. But what do I want with a bloody old handbag that one leaves in taxis and so on? It should all go into pockets. Real pockets, like a man has, for goodness sake."
Then Vreeland explained how she wanted to devote an entire issue of the venerable fashion magazine to "showing what you can do with pockets and how the silhouette is improved and so on."
Her colleague ran from her office - "the way you run for the police!" she recalled - straight to Harper's Bazaar editor Carmel Snow.
"Diana's going crazy!" he cried. "Get hold of her."
Snow went to see Vreeland.
"Listen, Diana," Snow told Vreeland, "I think you've lost your mind. Do you realize that our income from handbag advertising is God knows how many millions a year?!"
"Thanks. It has pockets!" - every girl ever responding to a compliment on a skirt/dress that has pockets- Tumblr/Twitter, attribution unknown
no subject
Unfortunately I still need to schlep my gym clothes in something, though.
no subject
OTOH, some evil people make even jackets/coats without pockets. Why. WHY.
Back when my hips were small enough that I could wear men's coats reasonably, I could even have inside pockets. (grumble)
no subject
. . . .and after adding those, the designers apparently suddenly remembered they were making clothes for women and removed all other pockets from the design. No hip pockets. No side pockets. Why would women need those?
Cargo pants. Missing the point.
But I bought them anyway, because they were $5 at the thrift store, and damnit, I needed thick pants.
no subject
no subject
My new year's resolution a couple of years ago was to never buy trousers without pockets. I don't regret it, although I've had a few shop assistants realise they cannot sell me anything.
no subject
no subject
(I work in an environment where people aged 17-24 seem to think that spandex solves everything and that leggings or even tights are equivalent to trousers and jeans. Even during interviews.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
MY AAAAAANGER